Skip to content

The Homo-Sexual OxyMoron Dis-solved…

January 26, 2014

Greetings,

Hope everyone is well…Under these very interesting sets of stresses in the system in general.

A creak in the fund-a-Mentals….a groan in the bone if you will.

First we till, then we sow, then we reap.

But I am getting behind my-self here. Please consider what I have to say here carefully. It is a linguistic panacea to the entire, globally challenged and challenging issue of the rights and lefts of home-sexual people.

And this is it…

There is no such thing as homo-sexual.

Sex (which is the generative Hex and Six) is for re-production. For Pro-creation. Of course I know this has been said before.

Here is the kicker….

All homo-sexual people are actually homo-sensual people. That is it….remove that charged sex hex from the heart of the matter, because it does not belong there.

Add some sense to the mix….solved.

And in that way, most hetero-sexuals are also mostly hetero-sensuals for the most part, being occasionally hetero-sexual for re-creation. Or is that pro-creation?

It’s all mixed into the words people.

Can you see it? There is no such thing as homo-sexual, there can only be homo-sensual. Makes so much sense does it not?

Imagine if tomorrow, every homo-sexual person re-inner-stood themselves as homo-sensual….

I also feel very strongly that adding this sensual aspect to the mix will allow people to have expanded physical expressions.

These words that have been thrust upon us….especially their twisted legal de-finitions.

So, what would happen if in a currently, legally homo-phobic nation like India, Every homo-sexual became a homo-sensual? By legal and common de-finition.

They would have sub-verted the law beautifully…..

Which is how it should be.

Anyone? Imagine understanding that probably 95% of human physical inter-action is sensual and only 5% sexual….

In my mind, that feels like a big trigger got dif-fused.

We are in-herently sensual creatures.

Rewording is rewarding….re-warding? Hmmmmm….

So, homo-sensuals of the world unite…..and dif-fuse the stress….be sensually free. To be….

It’s the power of the word, to create and tort/distort….

Time,  HIGH time we took the language back….

😉

In a word, a worLd…

Vivek

PS: Please pass this on to the global homo-sensual community in your connect-set….

12 Comments leave one →
  1. Dee permalink
    January 26, 2014 10:54 pm

    What are you smoking 😉

    We are all HOMO (sapiens)

    ( i’m going on a limb here) all like sex/sense

    senses is what we have got, to make sense of this place

    mind being a strong intermitter

    • January 30, 2014 4:25 am

      Indeed Dee. Like you said, it’s the “gap” between touching and feeling!

  2. blindman permalink
    January 27, 2014 5:36 am

    the term ando-sensual comes to mind.
    or is that just a bit more bull shit.
    perhaps “sensual” covers it,
    and is more than we can tolerate?

    • January 27, 2014 5:43 am

      In most of my interaction, over all my years, I found the thing that most people missed or were missing was tenderness. Sex is a battle, unless tantrically done.
      No battle of the senses,is there?

  3. Alison permalink
    January 27, 2014 5:23 pm

    Vivek, I think you expressed yourself beautifully here! When the student is ready, the teacher will appear. Some who think themselves students are not ready for the real
    Truth.

    • January 30, 2014 4:23 am

      Grazzi Alison and yes, the truth though is that said teacher is actually sitting in-side us, waiting to show-up! 🙂

  4. pall permalink
    February 20, 2014 2:20 pm

    how do I begin to call upon my teacher?

    • February 23, 2014 6:59 pm

      With-in pall….in silence…outside is noise…
      Literally, close your ears…..

  5. John Russell permalink
    July 16, 2015 12:54 pm

    Homosensual, exactly right Vivek, your insights into the English language are giving us English speakers new tools to help us better understand what we are really saying and why we say it, Thank you! No doubt you will have detractors, everyone who thinks has some who disagree or are threatened by other ideas than the those they have already accepted.

    • July 16, 2015 1:18 pm

      Thank you for your thought-full comment John. And in a duality based world, if I had no detractors I’d worry 🙂

  6. Sejal permalink
    January 4, 2017 5:44 am

    I agree with this so much. Won-dar how can a man impregnate a man and a woman impregnate a woman?

    • January 4, 2017 12:55 pm

      Precisely, thus the sensual tag fits, sexual does not!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s